Stuart
(and also the litigation team of around 20 people he
led within his former firm's wider litigation group)
were recommended by the main legal directories (Legal
500, Chambers and Legal Experts) every year from 2000
until he left practice in 2008 to become a mediator.
The following are direct quotes from the last five editions
of those publications prior to his leaving litigation
practice:
"Clients applaud his 'understanding of our business
and ability to handle the international aspects of a
case."
Chambers 2008
"Clients echo the view
that the team's particular strength is in 'developing
coherent strategies for the entire litigation process'.
... 'Head honcho' Stuart Chapman is renowned for his
complete mastery of the litigation process. 'He knows
when to grandstand, when to be calm and when to be assertive.
In short, he knows how to play the game.' "
Chambers 2007
"[The] ... team is led
by Stuart Chapman ... [and] is praised for its 'proactive
approach' and for 'responding to clients quickly, and
in a personal manner' ... ."
Legal 500 2007
"Clients marvel at Stuart
Chapman's superb insights into cases. 'He instinctively
knows what we want to do.' ...[H]e gained marketplace
respect as a 'polished and thorough' advocate."
Chambers 2006
"The excellent Stuart Chapman
... ."
Legal 500 2006
"One client described the team as 'the most user-friendly
and responsive bunch' he had ever come across. ... Stuart
Chapman, who spearheads [the team] has a 'telepathic
understanding' of his clients' needs, commentators said."
Chambers 2005
"... Stuart Chapman ...
enjoys an excellent reputation advising on high-value
technology disputes ... ."
Legal 500 2005
"... Stuart Chapman ...
is praised by one client for his 'high-value tactical
input and experience'."
Legal 500 2004
"Stuart Chapman ... is acknowledged for his expertise
in IT and media as well as commercial litigation. For
IT-related disputes there is no finer lawyer than Stuart
Chapman."
Legal 500 2003
"Observers endorsed head
of department Stuart Chapman as a 'personable litigator,
methodical in his approach'."
Chambers 2003-4
|